This construct isĪllowed by some compilers and is allowed if you use the +fpcĮxpected a scalar - Autodecrement (-) and autoincrement (++) Is illegal according to the ANSI standard. Remember thatĬasts do not normally produce lvalues. The left hand side of an assignment operator). Operators require an lvalue (a value suitable for placement on (signed or unsigned char, short, int, or long).Įxpected an lvalue - autodecrement (-) and autoincrement (++) The left hand side of an assignment operator).Įxpected integral type - Unary ~ expects an integral type Operator requires an lvalue (a value suitable for placement on More types or a closing right parenthesis.Īttempted to take the address of a non-lvalue - Unary & The processor is at a state where it hasĭetected at least one type within parentheses and so is expecting
Prototype is a function declaration with a sequence of types Is of the form: operand op operand where op is a relational (>Įxpected a type - Only types are allowed within prototypes. (perhaps it would be better to say 'definitely Boolean') if it
#Illegal index indirection not allowed c plus#
You may examine the list to see if you wish to be alerted toĪ few of the terms used in the commentary below are:Īrgument The actual argument of a function as opposed to a dummy (orįormal) parameter of a function (see parameter).Īrithmetic Any of the integral types (see below) plus float, double, andīoolean In general, the word Boolean refers to quantities that can beĮither true or false. Range 900-999 are called "Elective Notes".
Practices depending upon personal programming style. These may be errors but they also may represent legitimate programming Remainders in the range 700-899 designate informational messages. Indicate that something is likely to be wrong with the program beingĮxamined. Internal errors and should never occur, 300-399 are fatal errors usuallyīrought about by exceeding some limit, 400-699 are warning messages that Remainders in the range 1-199 are syntax errors, 200-299 are PC-lint/FlexeLint This isĪfter a possible 1000 is subtracted off, the remainder lies in the rangeĠ-999. Messages numbered 1000 and higher pertain generally to C++. For FlexeLint users, the file msg.txt can be found on Self-extracting executable msg.exe, found on the PC-lintĭistribution diskette, which produces the machine-readable ASCII file This information is also available from a Number in the list below you can obtain additional information about theĬause of the error. Most error messages have an associated error number.
#Illegal index indirection not allowed c software#
Gimpel Software * 3207 Hogarth Lane * Collegeville, PA 19426 It is to be used in conjunction with licensed FlexeLint/PC-lint software.Ĭopyright (C) 1985-2008 Gimpel Software, All rights reserved So it's now a collection of smart pointers which will automatically delete your PoolItem pointers on destruction of the container, or when they are removed from the container.Ĭhange line 27 to be returning a reference - because you know it's never nullptr.Vollständige Liste aller PC-Lint / FlexeLint Meldungen Weitere Infos: Features Misra-C 2012 Unterstützung PC-Lint Plus This file contains the text of the FlexeLint/PC-lint error messages. You should be using smart pointers, which will handle the memory management for you, and that will fix everything.Ĭhange line 35 to be: std::multimap> _usedPool There's another important question - who is deleting those PoolItem*s in the collection you reference on line 35? Then you try to return your temporary - but that isn't the one you want to point to! Then you insert it into your pool - so you've made a copy of this item and it's in _usedPool. ReserveNewItem has a serious logical error there. Help!įirst, thanks for a very clear formatting and statement of the problem! It made it really easy to debug. In MSVC 2015, this fails to compile with an 'illegal indirection' error on the return line- i worry that there's more that i'm missing as well. Without further ado, the MWE: struct PoolItem I'm getting an 'illegal indirection' compile error during the return of the reserveNewItem(.) function, and am having trouble understanding why as well as what to place instead (nothing i tried works). One of the class members reserves a new item and stores its' pointer in a used/unused pool to be reused later (if available). Hey there, I am trying to create a memory pool because the application i'm making reallocates hundreds of (large) things it doesn't need to.
0 kommentar(er)
